Sunday, January 30, 2011

Remembering Space Shuttle Columbia KIA By Enviromental Killer Foam

February 1, 2003 - Explosion of the Space Shuttle Columbia.

As memorable as the 9/11 tragedy, so was the explosion and destruction of the Space Shuttle Columbia over Louisiana, February 1st, 2003. History has given special notice to Space Shuttle Challenger's destruction 25 years ago, but why hasn't the disintegration of Columbia been as noteworthy? Maybe, it has something to do with Political Correctness and the EPA, proving again how our daily lives are excessively affected by Political Correctness and the EPA.

We have seen the deadly effects of the enviromentally obsessed: The banning of DDT which has promoted the killing of literally millions of people by Malaria which would otherwise not be a problem; the lack of refrigeration available to Africans because of the banning of higher performance freon, because of freon's threat of eliminating the Ozone Hole, which for some reason is not a topic, or a concern, just the same as Global Warming (renamed Climate Change) has disappeared from our vocabulary.

How many people have died around the world, even in Europe, because of environmentally mandated reduction of all forms of energy - except wind and solar which can only help to aid humankind in negligible ways?

No doubt, many humans will die because of our government's devotion to the very inefficient cornahol, the use of which drives up the price of corn, making it less abundant and more costly for starving people in poorer countries around the world.

This can all be explained by such seemingly innocuous orgs as the Sierra Club and the Audubon Society which have been some the biggest proponents of population decimation. There is no end to the craziness of the Climate Change environmentalists, very much at home in the Democrat Party. The environmentally ill have recently sought to treat cow milk spillage as the BP Gulf oil spill. There is no end to the federal government funding any sort of study which implicates The Enviroment as a topic. I wonder who funded the study that applauds Genghis Khan for killing so many people, thus saving the earth from millions of tons of carbon use - since living people deplete carbon absorbing earth to produce food. See eco-warior greeney Genghis Khan was good for planet. The Carnegie Institute funded it.

NASA associated James Hansen, who has been crying out in recent years for polluters (people who use fossil fuels) to be tried and executed, has now demanded that the earth "needs a green dictator" in order to be saved.

Since NASA has been relegated as "Lost In Space," in that future space exploration is not such a priority, the once formidable organization has had to climb onto the Climate Change (ne Global Warming) bandwagon for funding and self respect. Earlier in the last century, NASA was showing proof by satellite and hundreds of robot subs that the earth was not at all warming contrary to Al Gore's "expertise." Once the money started to flow from the fedgov to the pseudo National Academy of Science, universities, federal government bureacracies, etc., only if they supported the unestablished, vague science that the earth was going to die from excess carbon, it was game on for NASA to all of a sudden discover that earth was warming - by less than 1 degree in a relatively short amount of time - 150 years, or so. U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki Moon in Davos has just denounced Western capitalism, "in light in what it has done to promote global warming." Needless to say, Banki is Bonkers.


The Space Shuttle Columbia was disallowed from using a type of freon (technical explanation here) that was very effective in insulating its fuel tank, but it was not the most environmentally friendly foam. So, the EPA in one of its big-headed, bureaucratic, tyrannical rants demanded that the less environmentally friendly foam application be used, thus allowing for a section of foam to fall away from a fuel tank, and into the shuttle, dislodging the shuttle's protective tiles. Columbia, without the protective shielding, quickly burned up and exploded -all before our eyes. It was even more tragic than the Challenger explosion since there was much more mass media and television coverage.

Remembering the names of those heroes who died in service of our country:
From Wikipedia:


Commander: Rick D. Husband, a U.S. Air Force colonel and mechanical engineer, who piloted a previous shuttle during the first docking with the International Space Station (STS-96).
Pilot: William C. McCool, a U.S. Navy commander
Payload Commander: Michael P. Anderson, a U.S. Air Force
lieutenant colonel and physicist who was in charge of the science mission.
Payload Specialist: Ilan Ramon, a colonel in the Israeli Air Force and the first Israeli astronaut.
Mission Specialist: Kalpana Chawla, an Indian-born aerospace engineer on her second space mission.
Mission Specialist: David M. Brown, a U.S. Navy captain trained as an aviator and flight surgeon. Brown worked on a number of
scientific experiments.
Mission Specialist: Laurel Clark, a U.S. Navy
captain and flight surgeon. Clark worked on a number of biological experiments.


I can remember a time when NASA was a highly scientific and innovative
instrument of the Federal Government, known for its discoveries and "going where no man has ever gone," but after other failed ventures, and developing a bad track record in other launches, it could be found that bureaucracy, as well as the EPA provided the death knell for a once formidable American organization. How proud we were as Americans when astronaut Frank Borman read a prayer from his antique nose-cone spacecraft as he passed around the moon, way out there, about 290,000 miles away in cold, frozen, desolate space.


I can even remember when NASA's Houston Ground Control was actually
praying - without intervention from the ACLU or even Democrats at the time - that the first moon landing and walk be blessed by God. Not so much anymore.

The only thing that NASA has been praying, as of late, is that it may continue to ride the magic Global Warming carpet ride.

Never forget, this day, February 1, 2003, when the EPA caused the destruction of human life. Much more destruction by the hand of environmentalists has been planned.



Video of Space Shuttle Columbia..


Simulated Pic Below

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

The New York Times Must Be Held Responsible For The Tuscon Shootings And Other Crimes Against Humanity

First of all, I request that everyone say actual prayers for all of the victims and their families involved in the Tuscon Arizona massacre. What good has a "moment of silence," ever done for anyone in need? A moment of silence is like saying, " Lets not invoke the Almighty into this affair, as it might offend someone." Never mind that it might offend Someone to make the pointless gesture of bowing one's head and blanking out the mind.

Speaking of blanking out the mind, If ever there was a liberal zeitgeist going on in a community for some time it would be Tuscon, Arizona. Very liberal, and mostly Democrat, Tuscon has produced such luminaries as the teacher who taught Loughner to perform "Conscience Dreaming" in the local Tuscon community college, and Sheriff Dupnik, who's very name indicates that he was easily duped into proclaiming that America's "hostile environment" is due to the zeal of everyone from Sarah Palin, to Rush Limbaugh, to the Tea Partiers ad nauseum, ad infinitum.

According to Wikipedia (which has replaced the NY Times, "The Newspaper Of Record," because it is more accurate), Tucson is a Democratic city within the larger Democrat county of Pima, where liberal sheriffs, liberal schools - through college - abound. They regularly vote for leftists, including Kerry and Obama. Tuscon does have what is called a "weak mayor," Republican, who is legislatively outweighed by the Tuscon city council. Sheriff Dupnik has been called the "anti Joe Arpaio, for his pro illegal alien sympathies. Quite the rebel, that Sheriff Dupnik.

Is it not probable that Tuscon's Zeitgeist* has been heavily influenced by the disgraceful, blasphemous, and unconstitutional ravings of the NY Times, which has led the way for over forty years to eliminate everything that is good about the United States? Messrs. Sulzberger, Krugman, Herbert, Rich, Sulzeburger, Dowd, Keller, Friedman could easily have provoked Adolph Hitler, Vladimir Lenin, Pol Pot, and Mao to do the unmentionable, unthinkable, inhumane abominations they are known for in history. (I'm on such a jag of exaggeration, I could write for the NY Times). Yes, these Times editors and columnists did pull a trigger - in the minds of crazy people from the East Coast to the West, and must be held accountable. Economics alone should have killed off the NY Times, but I believe it was salvaged by a high interest loan from Mexico. We will not forget you, Mexico, for bailing out the Times, and we will not be vacationing in Acapulco even though a tourist rep from your country guaranteed that, "Signor, the drug wars are only killing other Mexicans, not American tourists."

*Zeitgeist happens to also be a movie/movement non critically written about in the NY Times - which was quite influential toward Tuscon shooter Jared Loughner's dizzy thinking. The very liberal Peter Joseph created Zeitgeist after exposing the "Christ Myth" in previous works, along with proving the illegality of U.S currency, and supporting 9/11 conspiracies. Jared Loughner seemed to have hated George Bush II as much as the NY Times, and had even less regard for Jesus than the New York Times - if thats possible.

Liberals, like the NY Times do not advocate discipline in the home, in the school, nor disciplining wild Jihadists around the world. Perhaps, a little more discipline in Loughner's life - like, what do you think - jail or mental institution confinement - when he was so disorderly, may have toned him down. No, liberals believe that, "There is no such thing as a bad boy," unless he is Christian.

It is very easy to pick out the Mother of All News Feeds, the New York Times as one of the prime instigators of such wacky thinking. The New York Times is even ahead of the Daily Kos, The Huffington Post, Media Matters, ABC, NBC, CBS News, Olbermann, Maddow, Matthews, Scarborough, etc. in its historic animosity toward eveything patriotic, sensible, civil, and holy.

It was the NY Times Paul Krugman, who, even before Representative Giffords was successfully, thank God, operated on, proclaimed that it was the conservative right, Tea Party atmosphere which induced the quite mad Tuscon man to produce such unspeakable carnage. It was the same NY Times which cautioned America (especially those on the Right) to not judge too quickly Army Major Hussan, a devout Jihadist Muslim, who shot and killed over 40 American soldiers while shouting Allah Akbar - God Is Great.

The Times has been notoriously reckless in tainting the minds of American citizens over the years by honoring such filthy artists, like Maplethorpe, as Maureen Dowd did last year, to Krugman's obsessive push to demand that the U.S. go into even more national indebtedness in order to save the economy. Also proving that Krugman's sanity is in question is reinforced by the fact that he was recently awarded a Nobel Prize, you know, that award that is thrown out for no obvious reason to darkened luminaries such as Al Gore and President Obama.

Practically every newspaper and Television news media outlet across the country, including the Associated Press, has adjusted its news presentation according to what is written in the money-losing NY Times. There can be no doubt that the liberal community of Tuscon, Tuscon's sheriff, its public schools, union teachers, as well as its liberal newspapers (Arizona Star wishes Sarah Palin would shut up) have been influenced by the Old, Rotting, Grey Lady. All The News Fit To Spit At. Jared Loughner was heavily involved in Satanic practices ritualizing in a tent in his backyard which housed an altar with candles and a distorted skull. Conservatives would call this nutty, the NY Times would see it as merely child's play. Loughner enjoyed the Communist Manifesto as well as another socialist workbook - Adolph Hitler's Mein Kemph. Clearly the NY Times writers have based their ideology on Lenin's and Hitler's ideas of a massive, omnipotent government over the people.

Loughner's crazy disruptions in class would be defended by the ACLU, and backed by the Times, I'm sure. I think I have more proof for these statements than Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow, Paul Krugman, and Sherriff Dupnik have for their outlandish finger pointing. They are the ones fomenting outrage, irrationality and paranoid schizophrenia. They are the ones trumping-up all matter of sin in order to seduce the American public.

They are the ones, again, threatening to unleash the FCC Fairness doctrine on Talk Radio, and they are the ones already demanding that guns not be owned by sane and law abiding people - which is just about everyone not associated with the liberal left. I do have doubts about Independents, because, I hear, that some of them read the New York Times.

I hope, some day, that the NY Times and their compadres on the left may be brought up on charges of crimes against humanity. I also hope that does not sound too violent during this time dedicated to civility. Right, they want us to be civil while they rant and rave and destroy our Republic.

Tuesday, January 04, 2011

Last Chance To Whac-A-Nancy. More Fun Than Whac-A-Mole.


Nancy Pelosi has "no regrets," after serving as one of the most flamboyant Speakers in American history. I have regrets. I recall her saying back in 2007, when she took over the House, that she, "had the gavel now," and "the power."
It was a very dark day in American history when Ms. Pelosi was elected by the very same media and socialist electorate who would later, unthinkably, promote Barack Obama to the Presidency of the United States.


Let's all take a breath and a sigh of relief as we watch our American Evita return to her 25 million dollar lifestyle in San Francisco, leaving her special Air Force airplanes, and too many crazy remarks and legislative actions to mention, to be forever recorded in the Congressional Record, citing her reign of terror/comedy from 2007 through 2010.


Someone in the future will be laughing at her antics, although many of us are still crying.

<

Foxy Lady Prof Says "Covet Neighbor's Goods" - But, Will She Share Her "Goods?"

The beautiful Caroline Heldman is a Professor of Politics at the very lib Occidental College situated on the left coast. Occidental is one of many institutions of liberal lower learning that started out as a sort of seminary - this one by the Presbyterians in 1887. How lib is it? Occidental guided President Obama during his formative years, and shaped him very well to go on to Columbia, which is itself so liberal, that Columbia Professor David Epstein is now defending himself for sleeping with his daughter.

Back to that cutey, Caroline, who has made many appearances on the O'Reilly Factor - because she is blond, and quite a looker. Unfortunately, whenever Prof Caroline is posing on The Factor her entire repertoire consists of demanding that people who have money be forced to offer assistance to those who have not. She never offers any constitutional reason for her coveting other people's money to redistribute to those in need. Even Presbyterians at Occidental should know that, "Thou Shalt Not Covet Thy Neighbor's Goods."

I sent the following letter to Prof Caroline, wondering if she understands, that when she demands others to give up their property, that she sending very real signals that her personal "property" is also up for grabs.

"Dear Professor Heldman: Unfortunate for socialists is that they forget that the command "Do Not Covet Thy Neighbor's Goods," was pronounced to protect - even socialists like yourself.

When you and your friends demand, via government fiat, the coveting and distribution of other peoples wealth to give to still other people, you are encouraging others who are less prosperous than you to take what is yours.

I am saying that you are opening doors for people who do not have a significant other as beautiful as you to covet you. Why not? What is there to restrain some bum from wanting to covet you - your body, included?

This is not a wacky thought, because if you are licensing others to take from "the haves," such as you, your liberalness has opened the door for others to not respect your person, including your personal territory, as well as possessions.

Why cannot the proverbial thug approaching you in the proverbial alley demand that you give him - you?
I mean, why cannot Professor Heldman be distributed, freely to whomever? The law is not able to stop this attitude and behavior as we can see from sociological studies. You social engineers cannot stop it - you only encourage it with your Share the Wealth (Share the Heldman?) constructs.

The next time you see a lonely male student on campus, he may have been taught by you to covet you. "Oh, there's Heldman, she has to share."


Sincerely, jc

Google
WWW http://joeclarke.net